universalinformer.com universalinformer.com
  Index Page :> About Us :> Add Url :> Security & Privacy :> Terms of Service :> Submit Article
Search:   
Get Multiple Links
 

Automobiles

Family & Home

Careers & Employment

Internet & Computers

Business & Commerce

Cooking & Drinking

Issues & News

Medicine & Treatment

Self Help

Entertainment

Academics & Learning

Children

Health & Hygiene

Culture & Art

Games & Play

Finance & Investment

Realty & Property

Law & Politics

Science & Research

Shopping & Auction

Fashion & Relationships

Society & Communities

Tour & Travel

Outdoor & Sports

 

Index Page › Finance & Investment › Investment
 

The Conflict of Interest Game

 

Author: Ulli Niemann

Disgruntled investors are going after Wall Street once again, this time accusing one of investment bank Morgan-Stanley's high-tech mutual funds of making biased stock picks.

Recent lawsuits allege the Morgan Stanley Technology fund was influenced to buy and hold stocks of companies that delivered huge investment banking fees - or could potentially bring big business - to the investment bank.

According to the lawsuits, the Morgan Stanley fund followed the biased recommendations of the firm's analysts - decisions that have cost shareholders millions of dollars since the portfolio's October 2000 inception.

The fund lost 48 percent in 2001 and was down another 50 percent during the first nine months of 2002. While Morgan Stanley strongly denied the allegations, I fail to see how the management of the fund is somehow distinct from the other divisions of Morgan Stanley. Ultimately, they all work for the same boss.

The suits further claim that the tech fund failed to disclose that the firm had investment banking ties with a number of companies whose stocks were part of the portfolio. They also failed to reveal that those links could affect the fund's buy or sell calls.

Why bring all this up? For one thing, it is interesting to note that Morgan Stanley offered four of these types of funds in October 2000. Just around the time when we sold all of our positions (Oct. 13, 2000) and it became clear, at least to those of us who were tracking long-term trends, that a major trend change had taken place.

More recently in the news it's been Merrill Lynch who had a questionable deal involving transactions with failed energy trader Enron. Of course, the financial services industry regulates itself so well, that an $80 million payment to the SEC is sufficient to wrap up this case without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

What's the moral of this story? While it is impossible to predict these alleged conflict of interest schemes, it is definitely possible to follow a disciplined approach and be on the right side of the market so you can avoid jumping aboard a sinking ship.

Author Bio:
Ulli Niemann is a popular columnist. Ulli likes to pen down articles about this area.
You can also reach this article by using: real estate investment, real estate finance and investment, best money investment
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Inventor of Swiss Medica's O24 Pain Neutralizer Shares His Secrets
 
Patent Litigation Financing
 
Refinancing Your Home to Pay for College
 
Shop Around, Save Money On Credit Cards
 
Refinancings are Expected to Decline
 
Preparing Your Finances for a Bird Flu Pandemic
 
Mortgage Refinancing: Comparison Shopping Will Save You Money
 
The Effectiveness of High Yield Investment Programs (HYIPs)
 
Asia's New Investment Jewel
 
Cash Back Credit Card ? Some FAQs
 
 
 
Index Page :> Security & Privacy :> Terms of Service  
© 2006-2008 www.universalinformer.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.